• About F & S
  • Our Attorneys
  • Practice Areas
      • litigateLitigation Services
      • REGRegulatory Matters
      • Commercial Transactions
      • Labor & Employment
      • General Counsel Service
      • Government & Passenger Rail
    • Close
  • Our Clients
  • Alerts & Analysis
  • About F & S
  • Our Attorneys
  • Practice Areas
      • litigateLitigation Services
      • REGRegulatory Matters
      • Commercial Transactions
      • Labor & Employment
      • General Counsel Service
      • Government & Passenger Rail
    • Close
  • Our Clients
  • Alerts & Analysis

Comprehensive Oil Spill Response Plan (“COSRP”)—Does Your Railroad Need One?

  • On April 1, 2019

By Janet H. Gilbert

The short answer is: Yes, if you move sufficient tank car volumes of crude oil, fuel oil, petroleum distillates, diesel or gasoline.

Effective August 27, 2019:

Any railroad transporting a single train of 20 or more loaded tank cars in a continuous block or 35 or more loaded tank cars of liquid petroleum oil throughout the train consist must develop a Comprehensive Oil Spill Response plan (COSRP).

Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA)

Final Rule published 2-28-19

What Does a COSRP Require?

Comprehensive Oil Spill Response Plans, or COSRP’s must address a “Worst Case Discharge” (“WCD”), defined as an incident with potential to release the larger of 300,000 gallons of liquid petroleum oil or 15% of the total amount of oil transported on the largest train consist reasonably expected to transport liquid petroleum oil in adverse weather conditions in a given response zone.  Railroads must establish geographic response zones along the various rail routes involved and assure that both personnel and equipment are staged and prepared to respond in the event of an accident.  The Plan must identify the qualified individual responsible for each response zone with 24-hour contact phone numbers as well as the organization, personnel, and equipment capable of removing and mitigating a worst-case discharge.

“High Hazard Flammable Trains” (“HHFTs”), defined as more than 20 continuous cars carrying Class 3 Flammable liquids or 35 cars spread throughout any one train, must share their COSRPs and related information with State Emergency Response Commissions, Tribal Emergency Response Commissions, or other appropriate State designated entities.

The definition of “petroleum oil” has not changed from the definition in 49 CFR Part 130.5 and the burden remains on the offeror of oil for transport to make that determination.

NOTE: Petroleum oil includes any solution or mixture in which oil is in a concentration by weight of greater than 10% (e.g., E85 ethanol would qualify) and requires a COSRP if sufficient numbers of cars are in a train.

CORSP plans will be approved by PHMSA (not the FRA). Railroads may submit plans that meet State requirements under certain circumstances but all plans require a 12-hour response time in all areas. A railroad must also certify in its plan that it has conducted training and that the plan includes requirements for equipment testing and exercises, with recordkeeping required for both. Plans must be updated and re-submitted every 5 years or within 90 days of implementing any significant changes or new routes.

 

0 Comments

Leave Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Our Recent Blog Post
  • FRA Publishes Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Revising PTC Systems and Reporting Regulations
  • FRA Publishes Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Requiring Certain Railroads to Develop and Implement a Fatigue Risk Management Program
  • FRA Publishes Amendments Making Qualification and Certification of Engineers Consistent With That of Conductors
  • FRA Publishes Amendments Adopting Waivers Concerning Air Brake Testing, EOT Devices, and Helper Service.
  • Effective January 8, 2021: Revision of Method for Calculating Monetary Threshold for Reporting Rail Equipment Accidents/Incidents
  • Illinois Appellate Court Finds Railroad’s Headquarters Insufficient On Its Own to Establish Illinois as Proper Forum for Occupational Exposure Lawsuit
  • EFFECTIVE OCTOBER 7, 2020: FRA Publishes Final Rule on Rail Integrity and Track Safety Standards
  • Illinois Two-Person Crew Law: Federal Court Declares the Law Preempted – But Throws a Lifeline to the State
  • You May Have More Employees Than You Think—At Least For FELA Purposes
  • At Long Last OSHA Issues Final Rule Exempting Workers From OSHA Regulations
  • United States Supreme Court Expands Protection Based On Sexual Preference And Identity
  • Federal Government Resources
  • Railroad Employer’s COVID-19 Manual
  • Minimizing Liability in Your Team’s Remote Workplace
  • FRA Issues Proposed Rule On Intercity Passenger Performance Measurements

Third Time’s a Charm! Fletcher & Sippel Wins Forum Motion On Its Third Attempt

Previous thumb

FRA Withdraws Proposed Rule Making Mandating Two-Person Train Crew and Expresses FRA Intent That State Laws Are Preempted

Next thumb
Scroll

Fletcher & Sippel LLC
29 North Wacker Dr, Suite 800
Chicago, IL 60606-3208

(312) 252-1500 (Main)
(312) 252-2400 (Fax)

Contact Us



©2019 Fletcher & Sippel LLC.  Branding & Designed by Menagery, Inc.